🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised guardians to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a future ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for children," said a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is largely happening at the local level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

As this global debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that states around the world are no longer content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.